Fraud Awareness and Prevention Training, Page 81 Reviews
We ask our users to rate and review our Fraud Awareness and Prevention Training course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...
Average score 4.7
911 reviews
Held my attention as the information was clear and precise.
I think this is a useful course to give the basic understandings of fraud and to repeat what you might've heard before. It's easy to follow and has a useful test at the end.
This course highlighted very important things to look out for.
This course covered all areas of fraud without being too in depth. 37 slides about the right amount, and the interactive components and scenarios were useful.
A useful course. Thank you. I think the fraud scenario of the insurance clerk moving the 'insurance start date' to a day later e.g. 1st October to 30 September by way of enhancing sales figures should have been made a little clearer on the explanation / background detail as to why this was fraud. I understand that this was the context of the scenario but, in practice, a customer that calls at 4.45pm on '30 September' to ask for insurance to 'go ahead' following an earlier quote, would not automatically necessarily result in cover being incepted immediately from 30 September. Indeed, this could be an indicator of possible fraud by the customer (e.g. if a loss had already occurred when phone to buy cover) and staring cover the next day might have been standard practice of the insurer. I think that the detail of this scenario should be refined a little to explain the fraudulent activity and context, although recognise it is just a short example. Otherwise, I thought that the content was very useful and well presented. Thank you.
A really great course which is easy to follow and includes cyber security. It's also short which is a plus. The test at the end was straight forward.
The course was contradictory. It started by highlighting that the most damaging cases of fraud of those committed by staff in the most senior and powerful positions, and also used Nick Leeson as an example. Yet every other example was a case of small scale individual fraud committed by junior staff. The course highlighted that the most damaging fraud cases are committed by multiple people, and every example was then a single individual. The course should either by focused on small scale, easily repeatable fraud that most people would be in a position to be able to spot, or on large scale, multiple people fraud that, as in the case of Bearings or Enron, could lead to the bankruptcy of the company.
Good course. Interactive. Easy to understand. Interesting case studies
Enlightening and well put together
No summary provided