Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Training, Page 540 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.5

10045 reviews

  • 72% 5
  • 16% 4
  • 7% 3
  • 2% 2
  • 3% 1
Legally inaccurate ideological nonsense.

Sex is observed at birth, not assigned. There is no such thing as a 'gender identity'. Nobody fits neatly into a male or female box and to suggest otherwise is extremely sexist, primarily misogynist as it has a greater affect on women. All people born with DSDs are either male or female, these conditions affect less then 0.2% of the population, many of whom don't even know. The trans umbrella is another nonsense term, originally trans meant only transexuals, i.e. those who actually have legal protection through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, although they remain biologically male or female. Intersex is not trans; everybody on the planet is non-binary for the reasons I've already stated, and likewise people who are gender-fluid are still male or female, how they feel or dress on a day-to-day basis is irrelevant. Everyone can dress how they want, it doesn't change their sex. When someone transitions socially, they are choosing to live how they perceive the opposite sex do, and when they transition physically how they perceive the opposite sex looks. In most cases this view is extremely narrow and completely at odds to the supposed nature of non-binary and gender-fluid 'identities'. Less than 6000 people have obtained a Gender Recognition Certificate since 2005, these transsexuals are the only people protected by EA for their gender reassignment. The law uses the terms 'men' and 'women' because their are only two sexes, this is an immutable characteristic of our sexually dimorphic species. The Incorrect use of pronouns is not harmful, to suggest otherwise is stupid. People might take offense if someone uses incorrect pronouns, but as it does not fall under a protected characteristic is this legally harassment? It might not be nice, but I have never directly addressed anybody by a pronoun and can't foresee any conversation where I would need to. I take offense at anybody's attempts to compel me to speak or even think in a certain way, so by your measure I would find someone telling me their pronouns and the content of this course offensive, and having to sit through this course a form of harassment. Why is there a whole section dedicated to 'Gender Identity'. This isn't one of the nine protected characteristics and so does not fall under discrimination under the Equalities Act 2010. I am going to ASSUME you have written this course after consulting Stonewall or their guidance, however this has been written with a view as how THEY would like the law to be, not how it is. Every workplace should try and make all it's employees welcome; encouraging companies to override the the exceptions allowed under single sex provision, in such areas as toilets and changing facilities fails in this completely. I will not partake in your training course again until I have been informed it actually reflects the law as opposed to this inaccurate rubbish. Whilst the nonsense you are peddling has no legal basis, my views do as per the ruling in the Forstater vs CGDE, they are worthy of respect in a democratic society.

1/5
informative and clearly presented

No summary provided

5/5
Sweet

Not a bad hour spent

5/5
Interesting, easy to understand.

Just great.

5/5
preachy. wordy

No summary provided

3/5
Very in-depth course for my role

No summary provided

5/5
Very in-depth course for my role

No summary provided

5/5
Very in-depth course for my role

No summary provided

5/5
Very in-depth course for my role

No summary provided

5/5
Very in-depth course for my role

No summary provided

5/5

Ready to get started?